THE Central Student Council and the Central Board of Students voiced their opposition to the proposed five- to eight-percent tuition hike set for the next academic year in the consultation with University administrators Friday.
Faculty of Civil Law President and Central Board speaker Victor Villanueva cited the University’s “billions of pesos in assets [which would enable it] to continue its operation without any increase in tuition” as their primary reason for their objection.
“[The University] has P6.4 billion [in] assets as of 2013. Kahit maibawas natin doon ang restricted assets, almost P600 million pa rin ang kayang pagalawing pera ng UST. What use then does UST have for such surplus amount of money?” Villanueva asked.
But AMV College of Accountancy Dean Assoc. Prof. Patricia M. Empleo denied that such surplus money exists. “The collection [of tuition] make good for the expenses [of the University] for the next five months.
“From April until August, we place these cash equivalents into lucrative investments for which we earn interests. In the end of the academic year, these cash equivalents are expected to be exhausted,” Empleo explained.
University administrators said campus renovations done during the current academic year are one the reasons for the increase.
Director for Finance Isidora Lee stated other reasons, like the University’s shouldering of educational benefits and scholarships, and the implementation of the K-12 program.
Villanueva criticized the University’s administration for using UST’s state as one of the top performing universities in the country as the yearly justification of tuition hikes.
However, Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs Prof. Clarita Carillo countered that mentioning the University’s academic achievements such as accreditation status and the performance in board exams during consultations is an assurance to students “that [they] are putting [their] money where [their] mouth is.”
“It’s not a measure of quality alone, but resources are needed in order to be able to deliver all those things,” added Carillo.
#AyokoMagmahal
“As news of the increase spread virally to the students in the past days, they went online to Twitter and other forms of social media to voice out their objections,” said Villanueva.
Many Thomasians expressed their dissent at the planned increase online through the use of the hashtag #AyokoMagmahal, which became one of the trending topics in the country on Twitter.
From faulty equipment to late and inefficient instructors, students tweeted many reasons why they did not want the tuition increase to push through.
Other Thomasians brought the protest outside of social media, staging a solidarity program at Plaza Mayor, held simultaneously with the consultation.
Should the proposed hike push through, it would be the highest since 2012 when tuition increased by 3.5%. Tuition was increased by 2.5% last academic year.
Section 42 of the Education Act of 1982 allows private educational institutions to set their own tuition and other fees, following rules and regulations set by authorities.
Law dictates that 70% of the hike should go to the salary increase of teaching and non-teaching personnel, 20% should go to the improvement of facilities, and only 10% should account for the higher educational institution’s profit if it is a stock corporation, if not, it should be used for its operations.
According to the National Union of Students of the Philippines tuition monitor, around 400 universities and colleges in the country will be increasing their tuition fee for the next academic year. The Commission on Higher Education is set to look into the hikes.
The next consultation between the students and the administration is yet to be set.
Photo by Vittorio Emmanuel D.P. Salvador